<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should climate hawks be rallying around nuclear power? Researchers show meeting global energy demand in 2050 with wind, water and solar &#8211; without nuclear &#8211; is technically and economically feasible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=552</link>
	<description>George Hoberg -- Seeking insights into governance for sustainability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Newcomb</title>
		<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=552&#038;cpage=1#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>John Newcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=552#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>Probably best that we might be able to reasonably hope for is a low-nuclear future, but that might not be attainable, given the emerging demand to wring more carbon out while maintaining a highly-industrialized economy. The risks of nuclear power begin with mining uranium and end with waste storage - but that &quot;womb-to-tomb&quot; risk is also present with coal-fired power plants. On a historical note, Vancouver Island came close to getting its own nuclear reactor forty years ago, as I outline in my brief letter at:  https://sites.google.com/site/energyinbc/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably best that we might be able to reasonably hope for is a low-nuclear future, but that might not be attainable, given the emerging demand to wring more carbon out while maintaining a highly-industrialized economy. The risks of nuclear power begin with mining uranium and end with waste storage &#8211; but that &#8220;womb-to-tomb&#8221; risk is also present with coal-fired power plants. On a historical note, Vancouver Island came close to getting its own nuclear reactor forty years ago, as I outline in my brief letter at:  <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/energyinbc/" rel="nofollow">https://sites.google.com/site/energyinbc/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
