http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638 George Hoberg -- Seeking insights into governance for sustainability Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:35:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638&cpage=1#comment-16672 What is the Role of First Nations in Decision-Making on Crown Government Resource Development Projects? – A Hoberg Course Brief | GreenPolicyProf Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:37:49 +0000 http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638#comment-16672 [...] In the typical situation where title is asserted but not proven, there is no change from the vague standards articulated in the 2004 Haida and Taku decisions: consult always, accommodate if the claim is [...] [...] In the typical situation where title is asserted but not proven, there is no change from the vague standards articulated in the 2004 Haida and Taku decisions: consult always, accommodate if the claim is [...]

]]> http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638&cpage=1#comment-13013 Why I’m Opposed to the Northern Gateway Pipeline | GreenPolicyProf Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:45:17 +0000 http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638#comment-13013 [...] know the test for sufficient accommodation, last clearly articulated in the Supreme Court’s 2004 Taku case, is vague. But my reading of the jurisprudence leads me to the conclusion that with such [...] [...] know the test for sufficient accommodation, last clearly articulated in the Supreme Court’s 2004 Taku case, is vague. But my reading of the jurisprudence leads me to the conclusion that with such [...]

]]> http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638&cpage=1#comment-8901 We Can’t Afford Massive New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure: Oral Statement to Northern Gateway Joint Review Panel | GreenPolicyProf Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:21:23 +0000 http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638#comment-8901 [...] know the test for sufficient accommodation, last clearly articulated in the Supreme Court’s 2004 Taku case, is vague. But my reading of the jurisprudence leads me to the conclusion that with such [...] [...] know the test for sufficient accommodation, last clearly articulated in the Supreme Court’s 2004 Taku case, is vague. But my reading of the jurisprudence leads me to the conclusion that with such [...]

]]> http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638&cpage=1#comment-5552 Why 2012 was the Year of the Pipeline: Reflections on an Extraordinary Controversy | GreenPolicyProf Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:06:56 +0000 http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638#comment-5552 [...] First Nations in BC have also been strongly opposed, and their legal position gives them considerable power. The fact that much of the pipeline’s proposed path (and the tanker routes until open water in the Pacific Ocean) in BC goes through the traditional territories of First Nations greatly complicates the rules for consultation and accommodation. [...] [...] First Nations in BC have also been strongly opposed, and their legal position gives them considerable power. The fact that much of the pipeline’s proposed path (and the tanker routes until open water in the Pacific Ocean) in BC goes through the traditional territories of First Nations greatly complicates the rules for consultation and accommodation. [...]

]]> http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638&cpage=1#comment-2509 Pressure Rising on Both Sides of Northern Gateway Oil Sands Pipeline: December 2011 Update | GreenPolicyProf Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:10:52 +0000 http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=638#comment-2509 [...] Nations consent for resource development and authorization within their traditional territories. Current law requires that they be consulted meaningfully and that their interests be accommodated. The test for [...] [...] Nations consent for resource development and authorization within their traditional territories. Current law requires that they be consulted meaningfully and that their interests be accommodated. The test for [...]

]]>