<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can College and University Campuses Become Nodes of a More Formidable Climate Movement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=806</link>
	<description>George Hoberg -- Seeking insights into governance for sustainability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Edwards</title>
		<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=806&#038;cpage=1#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=806#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>A very comprehensive, tactical approach and it may work if you&#039;re fighting a single project. But like so many climate change initiatives, I think it misses a critical point. Canada needs, but doesn&#039;t have, a National Energy Policy. All we do is fight at the project level and in the dark. We need an alternative and viable view of what Canada&#039;s energy future should look like, &lt;strong&gt; in energy policy terms &lt;Strong&gt;. The public needs to see a plan that makes the case for what&#039;s in the public interest and how we can get there, near term midterm and beyond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very comprehensive, tactical approach and it may work if you&#8217;re fighting a single project. But like so many climate change initiatives, I think it misses a critical point. Canada needs, but doesn&#8217;t have, a National Energy Policy. All we do is fight at the project level and in the dark. We need an alternative and viable view of what Canada&#8217;s energy future should look like, <strong> in energy policy terms </strong><strong>. The public needs to see a plan that makes the case for what&#8217;s in the public interest and how we can get there, near term midterm and beyond.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=806&#038;cpage=1#comment-3025</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=806#comment-3025</guid>
		<description>Blocking pipelines also serves another purpose - it creates an environment in which businesses see carbon pricing as a preferable alternative. Unless there is the threat of something &#039;worse&#039; from their perspective, corporations may never be willing to accept a price on greenhouse gas pollution. If the alternative is project-by-project blockage of their investment plans, they may be more willing to support an economy-wide solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blocking pipelines also serves another purpose &#8211; it creates an environment in which businesses see carbon pricing as a preferable alternative. Unless there is the threat of something &#8216;worse&#8217; from their perspective, corporations may never be willing to accept a price on greenhouse gas pollution. If the alternative is project-by-project blockage of their investment plans, they may be more willing to support an economy-wide solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
