<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Oil Sands Wedge: Could The Next Federal Election Be A Fight Over Dutch Disease?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818</link>
	<description>George Hoberg -- Seeking insights into governance for sustainability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch disease can be a form of persuasion for environmentalists &#124; ENV 350: Energy Policy and the Environment</title>
		<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818&#038;cpage=1#comment-3811</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch disease can be a form of persuasion for environmentalists &#124; ENV 350: Energy Policy and the Environment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818#comment-3811</guid>
		<description>[...] http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818" rel="nofollow">http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulcair Goes West, Giving Canadian Climate Hawks a New Dilemma &#124; GreenPolicyProf</title>
		<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818&#038;cpage=1#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulcair Goes West, Giving Canadian Climate Hawks a New Dilemma &#124; GreenPolicyProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 02:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>[...] GreenPolicyProf   George Hoberg &#8212; Seeking insights into governance for sustainability    Skip to content HomeAboutCo-authors        &#8592; The Oil Sands Wedge: Could The Next Federal Election Be A Fight Over Dutch Disease? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GreenPolicyProf   George Hoberg &#8212; Seeking insights into governance for sustainability    Skip to content HomeAboutCo-authors        &larr; The Oil Sands Wedge: Could The Next Federal Election Be A Fight Over Dutch Disease? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818&#038;cpage=1#comment-3307</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpolicyprof.org/wordpress/?p=818#comment-3307</guid>
		<description>There is a longer-term economic issue here.

If mainstream climate science is right, we should start seeing very serious climate effects within the next few decades.

At that point, major countries like the US and China may start finally taking climate change seriously. If they do, a necessary action is to reduce their usage of fossil fuels.

Canada may build billions of dollars worth of oil sands infrastructure, then discover that the world is (intelligently) refusing to buy the dangerous fuel.

Then we will have wasted billions on the wrong infrastructure, worsened the impacts of climate change, and given ourselves less time to transition to a low-carbon economy, raising costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a longer-term economic issue here.</p>
<p>If mainstream climate science is right, we should start seeing very serious climate effects within the next few decades.</p>
<p>At that point, major countries like the US and China may start finally taking climate change seriously. If they do, a necessary action is to reduce their usage of fossil fuels.</p>
<p>Canada may build billions of dollars worth of oil sands infrastructure, then discover that the world is (intelligently) refusing to buy the dangerous fuel.</p>
<p>Then we will have wasted billions on the wrong infrastructure, worsened the impacts of climate change, and given ourselves less time to transition to a low-carbon economy, raising costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
