Premier Christy Clark: More Reorganization of BC Natural Resource Ministries

George Hoberg and Stephanie Taylor
March 15, 2011

Christy Clark was sworn in as British Columbia’s 35th premier yesterday. In announcing her new cabinet, Premier Clark reversed significant parts of the tumultuous reorganization introduced by Gordon Campbell in October 2010. The centerpiece of Campbell’s reorganization was the creation of a new Ministry of Natural Resource Operations to consolidate operational functions of several natural resource organizations in an effort to create “one land manager.” The change caused considerable uncertainty and confusion.

Yesterday, Premier Clark put Natural Resources Operations back together with the Ministry of Forests and Lands. Mines, which Campbell had moved to the Ministry of Forests, has been returned to the Ministry of Energy (now Energy and Mines). There are no apparent changes of significance to Environment, Agriculture, or Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation.

click on chart to see more detail

Reversal in Rationales?

As we argued in our post on the October reorganization, organizational design involves complex trade-offs and reorganizations frequently produces unintended consequences. The new reorganization reverses one of the core rationales for the October changes: separating operations from policy. Since the justification for that change was questionable to start with, bringing policy and operations back under the same organizational umbrella probably makes more sense.

But Premier Clark’s change also seems to at least partly reverse one of the beneficial effects of the prior reorganization: bringing the operational approval decisions for multiple resources into the same organization. Responsibility for energy and major mining operational decisions has been moved back into the Ministry of Energy and Mines. This reversal would seem to undermine the promise of the October reorganization of improving the capacity of the government to address the cumulative impact of multiple resources, as well as deliver on the “one land manager” vision.

New Stability or More Turmoil?

Given the uncertainty created by the October reorganization, the staff of natural resource agencies and their clients would certainly benefit from a period of stability. Premier Clark’s personnel announcements send mixed signals. On the one hand, the leadership of the new organization might indicate that the new MFLNRO is here to stay for a while. Steve Thomson, who Campbell had made minister of the new Ministry of Natural Resource Operations, has been appointed Minister of the enlarged agency. Doug Konkin, the architect of the October reorganization, has been appointed Deputy Minister.

On the other hand, Premier Clark also signaled that the entire structure is under review. While details have yet to be released, Randy Hawes has been appointed Parliamentary Secretary for Natural Resource Operations Review. If the new organization were settled, there wouldn’t seem to be a need for a high profile review position.

Forestry First Again?

The October reorganization was in part justified by an acknowledgement that the relative role of forestry on the land base has been in decline over the past decade. While it is perhaps only a symbolic change, the fact that Forestry gets pride of place in the enlarged organization’s name may be significant. The new name hardly roles off the tongue and is remarkably long (exceeded in this cabinet only by Labour, Citizens’ Services and Open Government), so there must have been a strong reason to maintain Forests in the title.

Perhaps of greater significance, the BC Forest Service has been reunited. The October reorganization had torn apart an organization, founded in 1912, with a strong culture and great deal of pride. The new organization brings it back together.

For now at least.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Premier Christy Clark: More Reorganization of BC Natural Resource Ministries

  1. Neil says:

    Some more details on energy (my particular interest) here: Coleman does permitting of “energy” and mines; Pimm is natgas secretary and Yap “clean energy” secretary. But according to BCiconoclast Steve Thomson (Forests,Lands&NatRes) is ‘in charge of ‘ IPPs.

    So do wind farm developers have to deal with Thomson, Yap, Coleman or all three?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>